<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I think this is the extended version</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>* B. Sikdar, S. Kalyanaraman and K. S. Vastola,
``<I><A href="http://networks.ecse.rpi.edu/~bsikdar/papers/peva.ps.gz">An
Integrated Model for the</A></I> <BR> <I><A
href="http://networks.ecse.rpi.edu/~bsikdar/papers/peva.ps.gz">Latency
and Steady-State Throughput of TCP
Connections,</A></I> '' Performance <BR>Evaluation, vol. 46, no. 2-3, pp.
139-154, September 2001. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>and there is also </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>* T. Bu, D. Towsley, "Fixed Point Approximation for
TCP behavior in an AQM Network"<BR>Proceedings of ACM SIGMETRICS
2001.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>* E. Alessio et al., "Analytical Estimation
of the Completion Time of Mixed NewReno and Tahoe TCP traffic over Single and
Multiple Bottleneck Networks," Proc. IEEE Globecom 2001.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>in addition to the ones pointed out earlier by
other colleagues on the list.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hope this helps,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>-Hussein</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>ECSE, RPI.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=jshen_cad@yahoo.com.cn href="mailto:jshen_cad@yahoo.com.cn">Jing
Shen</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=Jon.Crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk
href="mailto:Jon.Crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk">Jon Crowcroft</A> ; <A
title=end2end-interest@postel.org
href="mailto:end2end-interest@postel.org">end2end-interest</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, December 11, 2002 8:16
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [e2e] Comparing different
TCP flavours? </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT><BR></DIV>
<P>
<P>There has been a paper on this ( maybe a little old )
<P>B. Sikdar, S. Kalyanaraman and K. S. Vastola, <A
href="http://networks.ecse.rpi.edu/~bsikdar/papers/globecom.ps.gz"><B>Analytic
models and comparative study of the latency and steady-state throughput of TCP
Tahoe, Reno and SACK </B></A>. Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM, San Antonio, TX,
November 2001. </P>
<P>Jing Shen</P>
<P> <B>Jon Crowcroft &lt;Jon.Crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk&gt;</B> çæ£æï¼
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><BR>panos
gevros' thesis looks at ensembles of different TCP's <BR><BR>TCP sweet (add
i. m d)<BR>TCP sour (mimd)<BR>TCP bitter (gigd)<BR>TCP stout...<BR><BR>i
don't know anyone who has looked at the real problem (lots of flows<BR>in
the various different startup, and post congestion event<BR>strategies) -
most papers appear to be about the rather rare and<BR>ironically terms
"steady state" :-)<BR><BR>having said that, recent papers (e.g. OSDI one
this week) point out<BR>that the average download object size is increasing
due to p2p...<BR><BR>jon<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>Jing Shen<BR><BR>State Key
Lab of CAD&CG<BR>ZheJiang University(YuQuan)<BR>HangZhou, ZheJiang
Province 310027<BR>P.R.China
<P><BR>
<HR SIZE=1>
<B>Do You Yahoo!?</B><BR><A
href="http://rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/?http://cn.promo.yahoo.com/cgi-bin/udb/u">"æ¯ITç²¾è±åï¼å°è¯çåè·æ¶å°å¤§å¥ï¼"</A></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>