[e2e] Re: TCP performance vs Path MTU
Nivedita Singhvi
nivedita at sequent.com
Wed Apr 11 09:21:07 PDT 2001
> "Oleg Vishnepolsky" <oleg at inforocket.com>@postel.org on 04/11/2001 08:15:35
> AM
> Does anyone have measurements that show dependency of TCP performance (for
> bulk data transfers, as an example) on MTU ?
> Thanks... Oleg Vishnepolsky
This is just a typical sample of what I'm getting on my boxes,
not any kind of formal benchmark.
Well, a very simple test that varies MTU between 256 and 1500
on a 100Mb lan between a 400MHz Pentium II and a 866MHz Pentium III
256 MB using a 3C905C 3COM ethernet adapter shows the following on
a linux 2.4.2 kernel:
Running a single netperf tcp stream test can saturate the link:
Socket Size (snd, rcv) = 131070 Bytes
Message Size = 64 Bytes
MTU Size Thruput Confidence
(Bytes) Mb/sec % # iter
------- ------- ----------
256 68.85 99 15
300 73.11 99 15
450 81.74 99 15
512 83.58 99 15
536 84.29 99 15
650 86.85 99 15
800 89.23 99 15
1000 91.31 99 15
1200 92.71 99 15
1490 94.03 99 15
1500 94.05 99 15
You normally wouldnt want to do this...
thanks,
Nivedita
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list