R: R: [e2e] [Fwd: RED-->ECN]
Panos GEVROS
P.Gevros at cs.ucl.ac.uk
Tue Feb 6 12:03:13 PST 2001
Saverio Mascolo writes:
|I have no reasons to believe that results reported in the paper below are
|not correct.
|Robust tuning of RED parameter is of course a great issue.
|Regarding Random Early Discard my question is: since the goal is to produce
|an early congestion indication through early dropping, why should we relate
|dropping to average queue instead of instantaneous queue?
because we want occasional bursts to be able to pass through unharmed- this is
important given the nature of data traffic- and in any case sporadic bursts
and congestion are different things,
cheers
Panos
|Average introduces delay and this is against the goal of having early
|congestion indication.
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list