[e2e] [Diffserv-interest] A question on Adaptive Protocols vs
ExpectedService Classes of Diffserv
Nabil Seddigh
nseddigh at tropicnetworks.com
Thu Mar 15 07:53:14 PST 2001
There has been work on both TCP modifications as well as
"Intelligent" or "TCP-friendly" traffic conditioners to
address issues with TCP over the AF PHB. We discovered
some interesting results in our experiments with the latter
approach - send me email if you're interested.
In principle, it should be easier to incorporate changes
in edge device traffic conditioners than to affect TCP
standard modifications. However, at the same time, there has
been limited implementation of intelligent traffic conditioners
or policers in deployed products.
Best,
Nabil Seddigh
demir wrote:
> My intention
> of asking this question was "do we need such an (adaptive) protocol
> complexity"? If not, then "do we need to have a different levels of
> complexity in the protocols that can used for each service class"? /Or
> "One uniform adaptive protocol will suffice cause traffic conditioners can
> take care of this"? I assume all is a possibility. What would be a proper
> trend to go? Thank you very much
>
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list