[e2e] Compression of web pages
Marcel Waldvogel
marcel at wanda.ch
Tue Aug 27 14:44:07 PDT 2002
Woojune Kim wrote:
>I've tried this out on a couple of websites but even though I'm sending accept-encoding gzip, they never seem to send gzipped files back... (Of course some sites do..)
>
Two points to start:
* No major web server has on-the-fly compression enabled as shipped,
AFAIK. With the amount of RTFM- and clue-challenged IT people out there,
this alone should be a good reason for it to be seldomly activated.
* Most large web sites generate at least a small part of the web page
(semi-)dynamically. Therefore, compression would require more CPU
processing.
Preposterously assuming now that at least some administrators of large
web sites know what they are doing, we have to conclude that compressing
on-the-fly does not provide any benefits, at least according to their
metrics.
My speculation comes to the following possible reasons (in decreasing
order of significance):
* Text (=compressible) portions are small compared to incompressible
data (images, media, binaries, ...)
* CPU overhead must be more critical than bandwidth overhead
* Administrative overhead
-Marcel
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list