[e2e] using p2p overlays to overcome recursive NATs/realms

[Michael Welzl]

> perhaps you should at least try to understand the operational business
> before you foam irrationally and inconsistently about it.
> 
(..)
> 
> it's not the evil isps, but the clue-free ersatz researchers who foist v6
> upon the world with a half-assed solution, more address bits and not one
> iota of work on routing, no transition design (pity the poor folk trying to
> sort out the dns v4/v6 transport mess), yet pontificate on the evils of the
> greedy bastards who are having trouble deploying the crap when only one
> significant router vendor can even support it.
> 
> get a clue

I wasn't aware of how much aggression lies in the IPv6 deployment
debate... is it really necessary?

Michael