[e2e] TCP, retransmissions, and ISPs with byte caps
Philippe Strauss
philou at philou.ch
Tue Jun 18 10:07:59 PDT 2002
On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 12:40:18AM +1000, grenville armitage wrote:
>
> David P. Reed wrote:
> [..]
> > Note that packet losses also cause the TCP to send more slowly, which
> > reduces the cost to the user in either case:
>
> I wonder how true that would be for the "think, think, point,
> click, <generate burst of TCP traffic>, repeat" crowd?
>
> The slow down due to retransmissions is probably swamped
> by the duration of each "think, think" phase, consequently
once a user a clicked, he judge the network by how fast the
browser diplay the result.
even an evil ISP would not have advantage to drop packet:
randomly: you lengthen the time to get the
document, worst, it it's a SYN, your exhausting patience
of the user.
> I suspect there'd be little noticable reduction in
> the user's attempted consumption of network content.
but increased crying at the helpdesk :)
no, frankly, to maximize a traffic cap, let the network
run as fast as possible.
I dont see any case were it would be a benefit, even an evil one.
regards.
--
Philippe Strauss
http://philou.ch/
L'indifférence est le plus grand risque de notre temps,
la forme civilisée de la cruauté. -- Zenta Maurina
--
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list