[MPLS-OPS]: Re: [e2e] Re: [ippm] [Fwd: State of MPLS deployments today]

[Antoine Bagula]

I have the impression that Robert's type of answer is typical on this list
when pros and cons MPLS is concerned. Thanks to Randy and Bob for their
interventions which i hope will help us avoid agressive answers on the
list in the future. I also think that as far as MPLS efficiency, utility
or whatever people should call as synonym of efficiency, several questions stand
unanswered:
1) Can people express their opinion on the list concerning limitations of MPLS ?
2) Can those who have solutions to these limitations also propose
these solutions ?
3) Did someone on the list gave an answer to the concern of professor Kave
:  what is the effect of traffic engineering on network performance?

BA. Bagula.

On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Robert Raszuk wrote:

> Hi Randy,
>
> As far as the clue part I would recommed to wait for VPRN presentation
> to go public at next nanog so everybody can judge who is clufull or
> clueless reg MPLS applications especially 2547bin :-).
>
> R.
>
> > Randy Bush wrote:
> >
> > >> I was saying that today we don't have yet (or at least I have not heard of)
> > >> a full MPLS large network. I was not meaning that nobody is using MPLS in
> > >> portion of his network.
> > > It is quite known that university professors are pretty much out of
> > > touch with real networks and reality.
> >
> > as opposed to out of touch with manners or clue?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ippm mailing list
> > ippm at advanced.org
> > http://mailhost.advanced.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>
> -------
> The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
>