[e2e] Is a non-TCP solution dead?
John Kristoff
jtk at depaul.edu
Thu Apr 24 12:30:29 PDT 2003
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 14:18:14 -0500 (CDT)
Saad Biaz <sbiaz at eng.auburn.edu> wrote:
> These non-TCP flows must first disguise themselves as TCP flows (put a
> 6 in protocol ID) and then use port 80.. This implies that the
> end-points must be aware of the micmac.. While possible, such micmac
> is certainly very limited.
> Or, are there commercial products using this?
I believe Real, QuickTime and Windows Media all do some form of HTTP
streaming or HTTP tunneling. A far end server or whatever has to be
setup to allow this of course. This has been available for quite some
time. I had used this type of thing with Real as far back as 1998 if I
recall correctly. I haven't kept up lately, but I imagine many a
filtered user has used it to listen to their favorite broadcast.
John
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list