[e2e] Is a non-TCP solution dead?

[Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar (UMKC-Student)]

> but if you feel you have a better way suited for your 
> application, you should be allowed to make it..

even end to end principle say so... But, many feel that 
broad band providers may negate the above point. They
mention it as a threat to the e2e principle. Try reading
lawrence lessig write-up

http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/200212/msg00053.html
 
> the provider is still carrying the traffic...the old telcos 
> (those which are
> still around atleast) are now going to carry the major portion of this
> traffic...
> but they will just be highways..how does it matter to them 
> what they carry,
> TCP/UDP etc ?
> 
> all you need is a "standard"..thats all.. and im sure a good group of
> wireless providers can help make that..
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar (UMKC-Student) <saq66 at umkc.edu>
> To: Injong Rhee <rhee at eos.ncsu.edu>; <end2end-interest at postel.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 12:13 PM
> Subject: RE: [e2e] Is a non-TCP solution dead?
> 
> 
> >
> >
> > > First all, the wireless world is tightly controlled by wireless
> > > service providers. They control applications that run on handsets,
> > > media servers, and even content providers.
> >
> > Yes. It is true even for the IP telephony market. But, looking at
> > the interest for wifi (wireless), broadband and flooding of
> > products like vonage (VoIP), we can expect a shift from the age
> > old telco models. But, obviously all these changes make your
> > customer a competitor. So, where lies the benefit for the
> > provider?
> >
> 
> 
>