[e2e] Is a non-TCP solution dead?

Saad Biaz sbiaz at eng.auburn.edu
Mon Mar 31 18:35:02 PST 2003


On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Hari Balakrishnan wrote:

> My comments were restricted to dealing with wireless bit errors induced by
> corruption.  Period.  I don't think having TCP deal with such link errors is a
> useful optimization.

Hari,

If an ideal TCP yields ALWAYS an improvement of 20 to 150% in throughput,
would it be a useful optimization?

Saad.




More information about the end2end-interest mailing list