[e2e] packet-pair probe implementation

S Puangpronpitag nuk at comp.leeds.ac.uk
Fri May 9 04:15:06 PDT 2003


> > I should have stated it as estimating the path or bottleneck capacity.
> > "Available bandwidth" was definitely a poor choice.
> >
> > Thanks for the correction.
> >
> > -Joseph
>
> I think it's a common mistake to confuse between available bandwidth and
> bottleneck bandwidth. In any case, available bandwidth can also be better
> estimated from after astimating the bottleneck bandwidth.
> 2 cents!

Are they different? How?
I would explain the available bandwidth as
   o "the lowest link speed on the network path connecting a sender to a
      receiver", which would be bottleneck bandwidth".

>From Vern Paxson Ph.d. thesis,
   the bottleneck bandwidth means "the fastest transfer rate the path
   can sustain".

Or, look at Keshav's and other few papers' explanation.

I think they would be the same thing, isn't it?


Nuk

---
Somnuk P.
---
http://www.comp.leeds.ac.uk/nuk
ATM-Multimedia Group, School of Computing. Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Tel:  +44(0)113 3436806                Fax: +44(0)113 3435468
========================================================
   **   I think & think for months and years  **
   **   99 times, the conclusion is false.    **
   **   The hundredth time, I am right!       **
========================================================
                                Albert Einstein





More information about the end2end-interest mailing list