[e2e] packet-pair probe implementation
S Puangpronpitag
nuk at comp.leeds.ac.uk
Fri May 9 04:15:06 PDT 2003
> > I should have stated it as estimating the path or bottleneck capacity.
> > "Available bandwidth" was definitely a poor choice.
> >
> > Thanks for the correction.
> >
> > -Joseph
>
> I think it's a common mistake to confuse between available bandwidth and
> bottleneck bandwidth. In any case, available bandwidth can also be better
> estimated from after astimating the bottleneck bandwidth.
> 2 cents!
Are they different? How?
I would explain the available bandwidth as
o "the lowest link speed on the network path connecting a sender to a
receiver", which would be bottleneck bandwidth".
>From Vern Paxson Ph.d. thesis,
the bottleneck bandwidth means "the fastest transfer rate the path
can sustain".
Or, look at Keshav's and other few papers' explanation.
I think they would be the same thing, isn't it?
Nuk
---
Somnuk P.
---
http://www.comp.leeds.ac.uk/nuk
ATM-Multimedia Group, School of Computing. Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Tel: +44(0)113 3436806 Fax: +44(0)113 3435468
========================================================
** I think & think for months and years **
** 99 times, the conclusion is false. **
** The hundredth time, I am right! **
========================================================
Albert Einstein
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list