misordering packets [was [e2e] Link Aggregation]
Reiner Ludwig
Reiner.Ludwig at eed.ericsson.se
Tue May 13 08:57:01 PDT 2003
At 16:34 13.05.2003, you wrote:
>[...] because most routers try to avoid misordering packets of a single
>microflow [...]
That's interesting. Do you have a reference for that?
For example, "Packet reordering inside the Sprint backbone" by G.
Iannaccone, S. Jaiswal, and C. Diot confirm what you say: "In contrast with
what has been reported in previous studies, our analysis shows that
reordering occurs in the backbone with a relatively low frequency."
(measurements from Aug. 2000)
An earlier study by J. C. R. Bennett, C. Partridge, and N. Shectman
("Packet Reordering is Not Pathological Network Behavior") showed the
opposite (at one particular point in the Internet, the MAE-East peering
point): "We have found, however, that parallelism in Internet components
and links is causing packet reordering under normal operation and that the
incidence of packet reordering appears to be substantially higher than
previousl reported."
(measurements from Dec. 1997 & Jan. 1998)
So, can we assume that packet reordering has become pathological network
behavior in recent years? Does anybody know of more recent studies?
///Reiner
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list