[e2e] double bland reviewing

[Jon Crowcroft]

In missive <40897C9F.3060201 at isi.edu>, Joe Touch typed:

 >>> how about we setup a parallel list to e2e, which is closed
 >>> member-only submission, but anonimyzed.
 
 >>Can you be more specific? You want to strip all attribution about who is
 >>posting?

yes

 >>> so then people could "safely" post drafts to get community feedback
 >>> without breaching etiquette

 >>It might be required to have a place (e.g., postel.org) where people
 >>could post docs without mailing them as attachments. I.e., if I post an
 >>anonymized paper, then you know who's posting it...

that would be a good enhancement

 >>> I have here (affecting a Tom Lehrer voice/accent) a modest example I
 >>> prepared earier of just such a possible submission - this is, of
 >>> course, not by me, but by my evil twin at Some Other Cambridge
 >>> University Computer Laboratory

 >>Thus the email source question above ;-)

 >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
 >>> Self Similarity in the Arrival Process of 
 >>> Network Systems Architectures considered Harmful

 >>Have you considered Sigcomm's OO session as an alternative ;-)


hmm - well, i was thinking that this could be a way to cut down submissions to sigcomm that are doomed  by having
them go through the informal filter of an anonymous online community review first, but without compromising the
process...



just a thought...
 >>
 >>--------------enig17D46315D0570CBC326C5D62
 >>Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
 >>Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
 >>Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
 >>
 >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 >>Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
 >>Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 >>
 >>iD8DBQFAiXygE5f5cImnZrsRAgaOAJ4t8A8tEphqqaIlVWMbu8IoywBH1gCfVb0R
 >>RPvOhLKpWyvQrGpnHwCYIoM=
 >>=BY0C
 >>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 >>
 >>--------------enig17D46315D0570CBC326C5D62--

 cheers

   jon