[e2e] Open the floodgate - back to 1st principles
Cannara
cannara at attglobal.net
Sun Apr 25 21:59:41 PDT 2004
Guy, I'll simply testify to hearing this from a variety of folks making
routers a couple of years ago, even at the big C. Maybe just a rule of thumb,
passed down from the past.
Alex
Guy T Almes wrote:
>
> David,
> A very good question.
> I will attempt an answer, but those who were active in this area about
> ten years ago should chime in.
> My impression is that, at least during the early 1990s and probably since
> then, there was a rule of thumb that a router should have a delay-bandwidth
> worth of memory per output port. This was understood to be friendly to TCP
> in that it would allow the buffer to drain while the TCP sender recovered
> itself from a stumble following the bursting of the queue.
> This was during the time when high-speed wide-area meant T3 across the
> country.
> This is not adequate to achieve the purpose then intended, at least not
> in what would now pass as a high-speed wide-area path. But it does add to
> router cost. I am honestly not sure if this rule of thumb is being
> remembered correctly or if router designers examine it critically.
>
> Regards,
> -- Guy
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list