[e2e] new mailing list policy in effect
Jon Crowcroft
Jon.Crowcroft at cl.cam.ac.uk
Sat Feb 21 01:12:01 PST 2004
there's an interesting analogy in what has happened to e-mail and lists and bboards after we piecemeal deploy
anti-spam measures, and what has happened to the internet after we piecemeal deploy anti-dos measures - nats,
firewalls, and other local-view only measures to remove locally perceived threats, and spam filters, balkanize
connectivity at the service and information layers respectively, and both do potentially as much damage as good -
we need to design some mechanism (in the mechanism-design sense) to make sure people have incentives to align their
filters to maintain end2end-ness - i have no idea how to do this - it seems like the hardest challenge in the
Internet today is to create distributed systems that tend towards maintaining end-to-end transparency despite a
background distributed threat.....
In missive <20040220232638.GA30439 at lcs.mit.edu>, "David G. Andersen" typed:
>>On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 02:00:49PM -0800, Joe Touch scribed:
>>> I am looking into that. It will likely be manual.
>>> Aaron Falk wrote:
>>> >
>>> >Is it possible to retroactively clean up the archives with a spam filter?
>>
>>A manually pruned version of the list archives can be found at:
>>
>> http://eep.lcs.mit.edu/end2end-interest.mbox.gz
>>
>>Anyone's welcome to it. It's not completely up to date -
>>I took the snapshot a while ago, but it's reasonably
>>decent.
>>
>> -Dave
>>
>>--
>>work: dga at lcs.mit.edu me: dga at pobox.com
>> MIT Laboratory for Computer Science http://www.angio.net/
>>
cheers
jon
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list