[e2e] a question about the deployment of SACK TCP

[Lars Eggert]

Kostas Pentikousis wrote:

> On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Mark Claypool wrote:
> 
> |Ron Lee writes:
> | > Only 5% of the TCP connections actually use SACK, (From Anja
> | > Feldmann, trace from 12/99) according to
> 
> Off-the-box Windows 2000/XP/2003, Solaris 9, and Linux 2.4+
> advertize SACK capability. No patches needed.

FreeBSD-CURRENT (finally) gained SACK support last week, too, and I 
think it's enabled by default.

Lars
-- 
Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network Laboratories
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3360 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://www.postel.org/pipermail/end2end-interest/attachments/20040710/473e9062/smime.bin