[e2e] was double blind, now reproduceable results

[Jonathan Stone]

In message <6.0.1.1.2.20040519194147.05b61bc8 at 127.0.0.1>"David P. Reed" writes
>At 04:11 PM 5/19/2004, Jon Crowcroft wrote:
>>well this doesnt argue that we should publish part of the experiment,
>>but even more strongly then that a unique observation should be
>>captured more completely.

>I don't disagree with making all the data available, and that is almost 
>always possible, even where reproducibility is hard. 

With the notable exception of whole-payload packet traces.  If you can
get permission to collect them at all, its well-nigh impossible to
redistribute them. For obvious and excellent reasons.