[e2e] TCP Local Area Normal behaviour? any references?
Jon Crowcroft
Jon.Crowcroft at cl.cam.ac.uk
Fri Jan 21 10:38:41 PST 2005
um, yes i recall that - any pointers to papers/web page/results appreciated.
We are a bit like Sigmund Freud :-
we base an entire "science" on pathological behaviour,
but most TCP connections are not congested,
just like most people aren't crazy
(or tell awful austrian 19th century jokes:)
how many papers written on bottleneck behaviour
and how few on whats normal?- what we need is
the Alex Comfort of TCP, so to speak...
hmm - i foresee a whole new conference on
packet loss and the unconscious
and
beyond the AIMD principle
and
endless arguments about IP SLA archetypes and TCP mandalas
:-)
In missive <20050121180410.GA6946 at isi.edu>, Aaron Falk typed:
>>Jon Crowcroft wrote:
>>>
>>> how fair/efficient is TCP in normal operation when there's no router
>>> or buffer in an intermediate node (yes i knoiw some switches have
>>> more than 1 packet buffers but ignore those)
>>
>>I seem to recall Matt Mathis talking about this at IETF around 5 years
>>ago in the context of MAC 'capture effects'.
>>
>>--aaron
cheers
jon
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list