[e2e] Reacting to corruption based loss

[Ian McDonald]

> 
> Should we treat path with corruption loss larger than, say, 80 % with
> e2e-means, e.g. CETEN? Or should we, in case those corruption loss
> occurs on a mobile access line to the Internet, make use of proxies
> here?
> 
> I´m just curious and unsafe about the "common" position.

My personal opinion, for what it is worth, with that much loss you
definitely do not want to run Reno. I would use Westwood as a bare
minimum and if I had control of both ends I would consider customising
the IP stack.

Ian McDonald
WAND Network Research
http://www.wand.net.nz