[e2e] a new IRTF group on Transport Models

[Cannara]

The operative words are "could be", which is exactly why we need better stuff
to get rid of "could".

Alex

Clark Gaylord wrote:
> 
> Joseph Ishac wrote:
> 
> >So, I'm a bit curious about the timidness to continue sending at a high
> >rate when faced with a large amount of corruption.  If you are indeed
> >
> >
> 
> as example: corruption could be cell loss.  cell loss could be due to
> congestion.
> 
> --ckg