[e2e] Reacting to corruption based loss
Bob Braden
braden at ISI.EDU
Wed Jun 29 11:43:40 PDT 2005
*>
*> Our experience was that for AMPS we knocked the baud rate down as low as
*> possible to 4.8K and abandonded the use of TCP/IP altogether as we could
*> hit packet rate losses of 40% quite regularly and dropped connections.
*>
*> We implemented a protocol on top of UDP where we just used a sliding
*> window (from memory about 16) and knocked the packet size to a small
*> size (about 100 bytes max) and allowed out of order packets but with a
*> timeout retransmission.
*>
How does this differ from TCP with an MTU of 100 bytes and using SACK? (ie
where's the magic?)
Bob Braden
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list