[e2e] number of flows per unit time in routers
Clark Gaylord
gaylord at dirtcheapemail.com
Mon Oct 31 08:52:57 PST 2005
Ghanwani, Anoop wrote:
>I have a very basic question -
>
>Is there industry consensus on what constitutes a flow?
>Theoretically, it could be some arbitrary bit mask being
>applied to every packet. However, in practice people talk
>about TCP flows, UDP flows, ICMP flows, etc. Just wondering
>if there is a comprehensive list of these anywhere.
>
>
You could read more from the ipfix group, but basically cisco got the
definition right with netflow. This gets messy with non-TCP traffic,
but what are you gonna do? "The five-tuple" is the usual shorthand
(dst/src address/port + protocol). Non-port protocols either have
something similar (a la icmp message) or ignore the port field. Note
that a flow is uni-directional, so some have tried to define the
bi-directional pair, but that gets dicey since there are plenty of
applications (e.g. multicast streaming) that are inherently
uni-directional. Of course, multicast is a bit of a special case anyway.
--ckg
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list