[e2e] number of flows per unit time in routers
Clark Gaylord
gaylord at dirtcheapemail.com
Mon Oct 31 13:17:46 PST 2005
Yann Berthier wrote:
> I would be tempted to say that uni-directional applications (which
> are quite the minority for many networks) are just a special case of
> bi-directional flows, with 'back' fields (number of bytes, packets
> and so on) filled with zeros. Now that doesn't change the fact that
> what is exported by routers is uni-directional ;), and that some
> post-processing work is needed to match the in and out part of a
> bi-directional flow. And i know no collector doing this job, so it
> would have to be done after the flows have been stored on disk, which
> seems to me rather sub optimal.
>
> Btw, there is now a draft for a bi-directional support in IPFIX:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/internet-drafts/draft-boschi-ipfix-biflow-01.txt
>
>
For most useful analysis, both sides of a bi-directional flow are
useful, but routing, traffic patterns, etc, are not necessarily
symmetric either. So flows are fundamentally unidirectional with
bi-dir a function of synthesis.
Pedantry happens.
--ckg
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list