[e2e] Performance evaluation of high speed TCPs

[Injong Rhee]

Reddy,
Sure. This is the first set of the test. So we
plan to add more TCP stacks as they become
available. If you have a linux implementation of
LTCP 2.6.13 or higher, we will add it in our test
script.

Thanks
Injong

Injong Rhee, Associate Professor
North Carolina State University
Raleigh, NC 27699
rhee at eos.ncsu.edu,
http://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/rhee


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Narasimha Reddy
> [mailto:reddy at ece.tamu.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 9:24 AM
> To: 'Injong Rhee'; end2end-interest at postel.org
> Cc: 'Long Le'; rhee at ncsu.edu; 'Yusung Kim';
> 'Lisong Xu'
> Subject: RE: [e2e] Performance evaluation of
> high speed TCPs
> 
> Injong, I am sure you are aware of LTCP
> http://www.ece.tamu.edu/~reddy/papers/pfld05.pdf
>  .
> I understand that it may not have been possible
> to evaluate all proposed
> protocols, but I hope you include it in your
> future evaluations.
> 
> Thanks
> Reddy
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: end2end-interest-bounces at postel.org
> [mailto:end2end-interest-bounces at postel.org] On
> Behalf Of Injong Rhee
> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 4:13 PM
> To: end2end-interest at postel.org
> Cc: 'Long Le'; rhee at ncsu.edu; 'Yusung Kim';
> 'Lisong Xu'
> Subject: [e2e] Performance evaluation of high
> speed TCPs
> 
> We have just finished our first series of
> performance evaluation of 6
> different high TCP variants that have been
> recently proposed. We have
> a report on the results below:
> 
> http://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/rhee/export/bitc
> p/asteppaper.htm
> 
> This report has been long overdue and can be
> considered as our
> response to earlier test reports by other folks
> publicized in several
> mailing lists.  What is unique about our report
> is that we emphasize
> on the importance of background traffic in
> experimental evaluation of
> congestion control protocols. The results we got
> with background
> traffic are quite different from what are
> reported in one of the
> earlier reports. It is not unknown that
> background traffic makes
> difference in protocol performance, but it is
> unknown how they make
> difference and what properties may change.
> 
> Please view the report and follow the embedded
> links in the report to
> get more information about experiment. The
> performance pictures in the
> report are a little blurred due to resizing. But
> if you follow the
> html links associated with each picture you can
> get a better picture
> of it and more information about it.
> 
> While we're preparing this report, we found that
> there are many
> testing scenarios that we need to cover, yet it
> is difficult to come
> up with a meaning scenario that could change
> protocol behaviors in a
> meaningful way. So we would like to solicit your
> opinion on types of
> testing scenarios you want to see. Also if you
> have other protocols
> that you like to see it being tested in the same
> environment, please
> let us know as well.
> 
> Thanks
> Injong
> ----
> Injong Rhee
> Associate Professor
> Department of Computer Science
> North Carolina State University
> http://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/rhee
> 
>