[e2e] 0% NAT - checkmating the disconnectors

[Greg Skinner]

On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 10:09:47AM -0500, David P. Reed wrote:
> Tell me exactly how does allowing an application that a network owner 
> does not like (perhaps promoting abortion for all or advocating murder 
> of abortionists, depending on your preferences for extremism, or 
> perhaps just charging usurious rates of interest or promoting gift 
> economies) "damage the network"?  

I went back and reread Saikat's paper.  I did not view his remarks in
the light that you seem to.  I read them as "a network operator would
like to protect his network from abuse, and enable its authorized
users to freely communicate."

--gregbo