[e2e] Delays / service times / delivery times in wireless networks.

[Detlef Bosau]

András Veres (IJ/ETH) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The 10 minutes reference in GPRS never happens in reality. It is similar to RFC 793 where an upper limit of TTL = one minute is set for TCP packets. Neither 1 nor 10 minutes actually happen in real networks. 
>   

O.k. 
Do 9 minutes 59 seconds ever happen? ;-)

WRT David: You´re perfectly right that ETSI has nothing to do with IETF. 
Similar to the IEEE (industry standards) and similar to 
DigitalIntelXerox. However, TCP/IP sometimes runs on real networks and 
therefore must use network technologies, e.g. IEEE 802.3 / Ethernet VII 
AKA DIX or GPRS (and therefore about 50 or 100 ETSI standards ) ;-)

Back to the subject. The GPRS standard specifies certain quantiles, a 
0.5 quantile and a 0.9 quantile for delays.
Perfect.

But in my opinion, this is not sufficient for a scientific discussion of 
the suitability of mobile networks for end to end protocols _AND_ 
applications.

Now, there is a huge amount of papers (I don´t even listen examples, 
there are literally hundreds of them, even in proceedings of highly 
visible IEEE or ACM conferences) which deal with
- delay spikes
- spurious timeouts
- large Bandwidth Delay Products
- adverse effects on TCP caused by proportional fair scheduling
etc. in mobile networks.

In fact, the whole discussion "is there a problem with TCP in mobile 
networks" deals exactly with these issues.

So, my question is in other words: Are these issues substantiated? Or do 
we hunt phantoms here?

And because I´m interested in finding an answer to this question, I´m 
interested to understand, where delay in mobile networks come from ;-)

> Andras
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: end2end-interest-bounces at postel.org [mailto:end2end-interest-bounces at postel.org] On Behalf Of Detlef Bosau
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 11:45 PM
> To: e2e; Michael.kochte at gmx.net; frank.duerr
> Subject: [e2e] Delays / service times / delivery times in wireless networks.
>
> Hi to all,
>
> I go in circles here and perhaps, someone can help me out.
>
> In networks like GPRS, IP packets can experience extremely large delivery times. The ETSI standard accepts up to 10 minutes.
>
> The effects of large and varying latencies on TCP are widely discussed. 
> However, I still do not really understand where these delays come from.
> When delivery times vary from 1 ms to 10 minutes, we talk about 6 orders of magnitude. My question is: What is the reason for this?
>
> Possible delay sources (except processing, serialization, queieng,
> propagation) are:
>
> - recovery / retransmission,
> - roaming
> - scheduling.
>
> I hardly belive that recovery latencies are that large because I can hardly imagine that a packet in the whole or in pieces is repeated up to
> 1 million times. And even if this would be the case, it is interesting to see the variation of such latencies.
>
> In addition, I hardly believe in roaming latencies. Years ago, I was told extremely large latencies would result from roaming. However, if e.g. a mobile roams from one cell to another, to my understanding it keeps its SGSN in many cases and only the antenna station changes. So, this situation is basically not different from roaming with a normal voice stream. And that works transparent to the user.
>
> The only source where I ever read latencies and delay spikes of several seconds is the Globecom 2004 paper by Thierry Klein, which reported delay spikes of up to 2 seconds. And when I think about proportional fair scheduling, I think this _can_ be a source of large delay spikes.
> However, I do not have access to any reliable material here.
>
> The problem appears to be quite technical and not very much TCP related. 
> However, I´m admittedly somewhat tired to think about dely variations and delay spikes and possible adverse consequences upon TCP without having really understood the reasons for large delays and delay spikes.
>
> I don´t know whether this topic is of intereset here, but I would greatly appreciate any discussion of this matter. If someone can help me on this one, he is welcome to contact me off list, if this topic is not of general interest here.
>
> However, I´m somewhat helpless here.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Detlef
>
>
>