[e2e] Why do we need TCP flow control (rwnd)?
Craig Partridge
craig at aland.bbn.com
Fri Jul 11 10:29:21 PDT 2008
You achieve research by looking at the points more carefully.
* Analysis is useful when employed correctly. For instance, for all
that Poisson is terrible, if you can prove a negative result with
Poisson arrivals (e.g. service model Zed is a disaster even if
arrivals are Poisson) that's a very strong result (as we know
Poisson is nicer than real traffic -- per Christian's note).
* Simulators validated by real world experiments are very valuable
testing environments (I have access to such a simulator for testing
wireless systems -- worth its weight in gold).
* Observations are extremely valuable when carefully documented such that
the reader can determine if the observations show a general truth or
a specific situation. Remember, we learned a lot during the various
congestion collapses of the late 1980s [and there was more than one], by
observing each one and comparing what we learned. Different collapses
had different morphologies -- one I still remember is when the Atlantic
satellite link got so overloaded that each connection's fair share of
the capacity was less than one TCP segment...
Or, to make this short -- we make progress by being (a) careful and (b)
smart (in that order).
Craig
In message <486C037C.4060300 at web.de>, Detlef Bosau writes:
>Good rant.
>
>And I coudln't agree more.
>
>Only one problem remains.... And that's a very honest question:
>If we agree upon some facts:
>- Poisson processes and Markov prossesses are of little use in
>networking research,
>- Analysis is not really helpful (and frankly spoken, I hardly believe
>those analytical TCP models, which are around),
>- Simulation can prove anything and nothing,
>- Observation is not reproducible and not systematic,
>so, if we agree upon the fact, that research on networking is basically
>impossible, _how_ can we accomplish research on networking then?
>
>It's of course allowed - and it's always scientifically correct to do so
>- to put in question anything we have.
>But if we only see blind alleys, how do we find a way out?
>
>
>
>--
>Detlef Bosau Mail: detlef.bosau at web.de
>Galileistrasse 30 Web: http://www.detlef-bosau.de
>70565 Stuttgart Skype: detlef.bosau
>Mobile: +49 172 681 9937
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list