[e2e] TCP Loss Differentiation
Detlef Bosau
detlef.bosau at web.de
Sun Feb 22 09:38:20 PST 2009
Jon Crowcroft wrote:
> hmmm - do you want the CS answer or the EE answer
>
> i think the CS answer is that you can't differentiate
> congestion from failure causes for loss on a per packet basis
>
> thought experiment - what if a packet that is ECN marked gets lost?
>
...then the ECN mark is lost as well :-)
That's the very strenght of implicitely signalling congestion by packet
loss: loss cannot get lost :-)
> i think the EE answer is that you could infer the likely cause
> from the statistics of the channel over the recent past. of course, it
> may be easier to do this at a receiver than a sender.
>
So, you make a maximum likelihood decision, correct? Of course, such a
decision may be wrong.
Hence, I personally tend to the CS answer ;-)
>
> in multihop radio networks (especially if you have multipath routing),
> there is even a problem statistically
> dis-ambiguating packet loss due to congestion and interference, since
> some intererence is due to other packets on parallel flows that go
> over "links" that are near enough (even on "link disjoint" routes)
> to cause interference...(think "rubbernecking")
>
>
When I wrote my first post in this thread, I intentionally did not
consider multipath routing on network layer.
I well consider multipath routing on physical layer. More precisely, I
thought of networks like HSDPA, which don't support soft handover to my
knowledge.
In UMTS networks with soft handover, the situation may be different of
course.
And not only different, but interesting as well, because multipath
routing on network layer may result in different routes with different
capacities as well....
Now, I have written some brainless stuff on this matter and submitted it
somewhere.... And thinking about this, I'm curious whether I will get a
remark on this one by the reviewers ;-)
--
Detlef Bosau Mail: detlef.bosau at web.de
Galileistrasse 30 Web: http://www.detlef-bosau.de
70565 Stuttgart Skype: detlef.bosau
Mobile: +49 172 681 9937
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list