[e2e] TCP Performance with Traffic Policing
Barry Constantine
Barry.Constantine at jdsu.com
Wed Aug 17 11:57:43 PDT 2011
I understand, but the client iperf "window" setting (-w 64KB) is really the send buffer so only 64KB was attempted to be in-flight (not 4MB).
Are we in sync?
Thanks,
Barry
From: detlef.bosau at web.de [mailto:detlef.bosau at web.de]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 2:47 PM
To: end2end-interest at postel.org
Cc: Barry Constantine
Subject: Re: [e2e] TCP Performance with Traffic Policing
On 08/17/2011 08:17 PM, Barry Constantine wrote:
I just did not want the receiving side (server) to limit the performance.
The RWIN does "dip" as the server receives data, but the advertised maximum was 4M.
Hm. May I quote your original post?
50 msec RTT and bottleneck bandwidth = 10 Mbps, so BDP was 62,000 bytes.
Could this be a clue?
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Detlef Bosau
Galileistraße 30
70565 Stuttgart Tel.: +49 711 5208031
mobile: +49 172 6819937
skype: detlef.bosau
ICQ: 566129673
detlef.bosau at web.de<mailto:detlef.bosau at web.de> http://www.detlef-bosau.de
------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/end2end-interest/attachments/20110817/ca37783f/attachment.html
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list