[e2e] Difference wired, wireless, was: Re: Taking RTT Samples.
Detlef Bosau
detlef.bosau at web.de
Sat Aug 20 03:26:44 PDT 2011
On 08/16/2011 05:55 PM, Mark Allman wrote:
>> I'm curious whether we shall take RTT Samples for each segment or
>> not. AFAIK, the RFC encourage one RTT timer, which is started at
>> least once a round.
>>
>> An alternative way would be one timer per segment.
> Our work suggests that multiple samples per RTT does not help the
> estimator.
>
> See:
>
> Mark Allman, Vern Paxson. On Estimating End-to-End Network Path
> Properties. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Technical Symposium,
> Cambridge, MA, September 1999.
> http://www.icir.org/mallman/papers/estimation.ps
>
> allman
>
>
So, in general we can assume: In wired internetworks, we have reasonable
RTT/RTO estimators.
Now, when it comes to WWAN, which is basically my central interest, will
these mechanisms still hold?
And do we have evidence for or against this?
Detlef
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Detlef Bosau
Galileistraße 30
70565 Stuttgart Tel.: +49 711 5208031
mobile: +49 172 6819937
skype: detlef.bosau
ICQ: 566129673
detlef.bosau at web.de http://www.detlef-bosau.de
------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list