[e2e] [tcpm] RTTM + timestamps
Alexander Zimmermann
alexander.zimmermann at comsys.rwth-aachen.de
Sat Jul 30 06:59:45 PDT 2011
Detlef,
why do you hijack this thread? This is a TCPM not an e2e thread! Nobody can follow crazy cross-posting.
Sorry, you waste my time. I don't reply on this.
Alex
Am 30.07.2011 um 13:43 schrieb Detlef Bosau:
> Just see this post.
>
> On 01/17/2011 03:35 PM, Alexander Zimmermann wrote:
>> Eh... With RFC1323, you take RTT samples when loss occurs.
>
> You don't take anything, particularly no RTT samples, when loss occurs.
>
>>> However, solving the retransmission ambiguity problem -
>> The problem is solved, isn't it? Eifel?
>>
>
> The timer ambiguity was originally solved by Karn & Partridge. To my understanding, this ambguity does not even occur when timestamps are used. Do you agree?
>
>
>> And a citation form Sally Floyd to that topic:
>>
>> "Inferring congestion vs. corruption at the transport level. There are also papers that investigate
>> algorithms for the transport end-nodes to infer that certain drops are from corruption rather than
>> congestion, without explicit feedback from routers. My own view would be that the burden is on such
>> approaches to show that they are not ignoring legitimate congestion indications from the network."
>>
>> eg: S.Biaz and N. Vaidya. Discriminating Congestion Losses from Wireless Losses Using Interarrival
>> Times at the Receiver. IEEE Symposium on Application-Specific Systems and Software Engineering and
>> Technology, Mar 1999.
>
> There are lots of papers in that direction, however, I don't see a reasonable way to infer the true reason for a concrete packet loss on an end to end basis.
>
> And that is a different story from RTT sampling.
>
>>
>>
>>> However, the current specs in RFC1323 make that use impossible, thus a modified signaling (receiver behavior) is a necessity.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The first central aspect of the above mentioned points is to resolve the retransmission ambiguity
>> Again, Eifel?
>
> Again, I think, Eifel solves a different problem.
>
> Eifel deals with dectecting spurious timeouts.
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Detlef Bosau
> Galileistraße 30
> 70565 Stuttgart Tel.: +49 711 5208031
> mobile: +49 172 6819937
> skype: detlef.bosau
> ICQ: 566129673
> detlef.bosau at web.de http://www.detlef-bosau.de
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
//
// Dipl.-Inform. Alexander Zimmermann
// Department of Computer Science, Informatik 4
// RWTH Aachen University
// Ahornstr. 55, 52056 Aachen, Germany
// phone: (49-241) 80-21422, fax: (49-241) 80-22222
// email: zimmermann at cs.rwth-aachen.de
// web: http://www.umic-mesh.net
//
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 243 bytes
Desc: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
Url : http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/end2end-interest/attachments/20110730/497e0bb3/PGP.bin
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list