[e2e] Delivery Times .... was Re: Bandwidth, was: Re: Free Internet & IPv6
Detlef Bosau
detlef.bosau at web.de
Thu Dec 27 01:05:36 PST 2012
Am 27.12.2012 00:01, schrieb dpreed at reed.com:
>
> In mobile networks (let's include wifi there) a packet is either
> reliably delivered - in unpredictable time.
> Or it is unreliably delivered - that is possible in predictable time.
>
> That is also true of wired networks.
>
Absolutely. However, in wired networks packet corruption is (hopefully)
that rare, that the "unreliably delivered" packets are delivered
"unreliably" with p_succ= 0.9999 or something similar. (Simply spoken:
Corruption loss is typically ignored.)
>
> It is the fundamental constraint of packet networking. At any level,
> one can decide to choose either case. Rather than "unpredictable",
> one should say "unbounded stochastic".
>
E.g. in GPRS, the standard defines certain quantiles. E.g. for 1024
bytes, we have certain delay classes:
mean 0.95 quantil
1.: < 2s < 7
2.: < 15s < 75s
3.: < 75s < 375s
I don't now whether "mean" refers to "average value" or "median".
Each class refers to some different sdu corruption probability. (I don't
have the values in mind, may be 10^-3, 10^-5, 10^-9, however 10^-9 will
ever be implemented.... ;-))
If you have a look at typical simulation systems, e.g. the NS-2,
wireless interfaces are assigned a certain "rate". Which implicitly
assumes a more or less stationary delay. Does that make sense?
Particularly, as the extremely high latency 375 s most likely refers to
some "countless" repetition of packets (100 times, 1000 times....),
which may indicate a situation where we should rather choose a different
interface or a different route if possible.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Detlef Bosau
Galileistraße 30
70565 Stuttgart Tel.: +49 711 5208031
mobile: +49 172 6819937
skype: detlef.bosau
ICQ: 566129673
detlef.bosau at web.de http://www.detlef-bosau.de
------------------------------------------------------------------
The nonsense that passes for knowledge around wireless networking,
even taught by "professors of networking" is appalling. It's the
blind leading the blind. (D.P. Reed, 2012/12/25)
------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/end2end-interest/attachments/20121227/d9c2c814/attachment.html
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list