[e2e] [Iccrg] Re: Reasons not to deply TCP BIC/Cubic
Detlef Bosau
detlef.bosau at web.de
Thu Feb 2 03:51:40 PST 2012
On 02/01/2012 11:20 PM, Daniel Havey wrote:
> Hehe ;^) I agree with Detlef. We have to be more careful with our terminology, and we have to be specific about the network conditions that we are talking about.
>
> For instance we were talking about delay. Lachlan said, something to the effect of Cubic causes large delays. I don't think it does.
Unfortunately, I don't see Lachlan's post yet. However, what shall be
the reason for the delay? It's hardly a propagation delay on the path,
neither a serialization delay, which may cause grief here. If ever, the
problem is likely to be caused by queuing delays. Do you agree here?
> Soooo, I have an issue with the term "quickly".
Actually, the term is precisely determined :-)
> I see TCP as a control system with a delayed feedback loop.
This is an always interesting analogy - however, at least to me, not a
very helpful one. (And I well expect criticism by Saverio here. IIRC,
Saverio did quite a lot of work on analytical models for TCP. However,
all these analytical discussions which are necessary for doing control
theoretical considerations, did not yet convince me.)
> The feedback is an ACK or a dupAck. How quickly a TCP reacts is completely dependent on RTT (how long it takes for the feedback signal to return to the sender). If I send a packet and it is lost, I will not know it until the ACK from the next packet reaches me. If the packet is received, I should know about it slightly sooner. This is how quickly a TCP can react to changes in the network.
Exactly. And if you introduce queuing delay into the network, you will
slow down the reaction significantly.
> I think what Mirja is talking about is the aggressiveness of the response to a feedback signal. This is determined by the congestion control algorithm. Cubic tends to be more aggressive than Reno.
And "more aggressive" does not necessarily mean "better".
So, I repeat my statement: We should rather spend some time talking
about the problem then perhaps waste time talking about appealing
solutions which are yet to find a problem.
Detlef
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Detlef Bosau
Galileistraße 30
70565 Stuttgart Tel.: +49 711 5208031
mobile: +49 172 6819937
skype: detlef.bosau
ICQ: 566129673
detlef.bosau at web.de http://www.detlef-bosau.de
------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list