[e2e] Discrete IP

[Pars Mutaf]

That did not made sense. You are exaggerating the work you did on IPv6.

On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 5:49 PM, <bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com> wrote:

> >
> > Your mistake here is the illusion that you can take this decision for
> > others.
> > For example me, I want to use IPv9 in my country and for this I am ready
> to
> > pay the following processing cost for each packet:
> >
> > IPv4 packet comes in.
> > I remove the header.
> > I replace it with a IPv9 header.
> > I route the packet.
> > (and vice versa)
> >
> > Details are in the paper (presented in the original post). This is just
> an
> > example of what I want to do... Who can say no and why?
> >
>
>         You are certainly free to do as you have outlined.  Just not be
> surprised
>         when:
>
>         a) things don't work as planned, since its not just the header
> that is involved
>         and
>         b) your definition of IPv9 (or pick something else - say IPv6) is
> unlike the
>            agreed on standard - via the IETF, which has perview of the IP
> specs.
>         and
>         c) you pass and enforce legal constraints to force all
> communications that crosses
>            your countries political borders to cross through your address
> translators only
>            to find yourselves isolated from the rest of the world.
>
>
>         Please proceed with your implementation plans and report back on
> your success.
>         the thousands of others who have been down this path before
> -MIGHT- have missed
>         something that is crystal clear to you and you alone.
>
> /bill
>



-- 
http://www.content-based-science.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/end2end-interest/attachments/20120915/dbf741b7/attachment.html