[e2e] Discrete IP - retake
Noel Chiappa
jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Tue Sep 18 09:31:51 PDT 2012
> From: Jon Crowcroft <Jon.Crowcroft at cl.cam.ac.uk>
> IPv6 is/was, in my view, another example of such a massive effort and
> although it is flawed (it was the result of a compromise between two
> better proposals which were each potentially much easier to deploy
> ...
> the solution was one of (in my opinion) the great failings of the IETF
> when it agreed to combine them (a committee type decision) rather than
> just do both and see which got out most. (the two, if you want ancient
> history, were Steve's IP and Paul's IP .. the simple internet protocol
> had 64 bit addresses and everything else prety miuch the same
So I'm clearly missing something.
How would SIP have been any easier-to/better-at actually being deployed than
IPv6 (since as you yourself point out, it was basically smaller addresses
and "everything else prety much the same")?
Noel
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list