[e2e] Why do we need congestion control?
Detlef Bosau
detlef.bosau at web.de
Thu Apr 4 08:23:09 PDT 2013
After some additional thinking: "Fair dropping" is exactly what we
attempt to do in the moment.
However, VJCC and flavours affect the /throughput///while the
decongestion work affekts the /goodput/.
So both solutions will encounter the same difficulties, however one of
them is cheaper.
O.k., workshop paper, that's fine. That's the purpose of workshops:
Gather ideas, present them, assess them.
DB
Am 04.04.2013 13:31, schrieb Detlef Bosau:
> Simple question. Where is "fair dropping" that different from "fair
> queueing"?
>
> I'm with you that we try to obviate the need of some reasonable
> resource management in the Internet. However: When you require some
> "fair dropping" mechanism, you could simply use the same
> implementation and instead of scheduling n flows in a round robin
> manner like this: "Each turn, one flow is served and n-1 packets are
> dropped" frame as "Each turn, one flow is served and the other n-1
> flows wait." And then you have the fair queueing approach which
> already well exists. And which you reject because it would be too
> expensive.
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Detlef Bosau
Galileistraße 30
70565 Stuttgart Tel.: +49 711 5208031
mobile: +49 172 6819937
skype: detlef.bosau
ICQ: 566129673
detlef.bosau at web.de http://www.detlef-bosau.de
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/end2end-interest/attachments/20130404/2854efdb/attachment-0001.html
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list