[e2e] Answer to Dave Reed Re: Fwd: Re: Question the other way round:

[Andrew Mcgregor]

In which case... measure, don't assume.  Served us well for 802.11
modulation selection, I don't see why it shouldn't work for AQM.


On 29 November 2013 04:05, Detlef Bosau <detlef.bosau at web.de> wrote:

> I think it was stated quite often already, but all these QoS concepts
> work pretty fine in wire line networks or in some well designed wireless
> point to point networks.
>
> As soon as any other wireless concepts come into play, you cannot even
> bridge the gap between net data rate and throughput
>
> Detlef
>
> Am 28.11.2013 06:17, schrieb sthaug at nethelp.no:
> >> Another issue is that QoS is often achieved at layer 2, hence most of
> >> the work is done at the ATM, cell relay, frame relay, MLPS .... level,
> >> is there really that much work done at the IP layer or higher?
> > In our case, QoS is normally configured at L3, at the network edge.
> > *Queuing* often takes place at L2 (MPLS) in the core of the network,
> > but there is of course also queuing at the edge.
> >
> > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Detlef Bosau
> Galileistraße 30
> 70565 Stuttgart                            Tel.:   +49 711 5208031
>                                            mobile: +49 172 6819937
>                                            skype:     detlef.bosau
>                                            ICQ:          566129673
> detlef.bosau at web.de                     http://www.detlef-bosau.de
>
>


-- 
Andrew McGregor | SRE | andrewmcgr at google.com | +61 4 8143 7128